Редактирование: Headmin Rulings (раздел)

=== Law Interpretation Rulings ===
----
{|class="wikitable" border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="2"
! scope="col" style='width:20%; background-color:#cc6666;'|Policy
! scope="col" style='background-color:#cc6666;'|Ruling
! scope="col" style='text-align: center; width:10%; background-color:#cc6666;'|Date
! scope="col" style='text-align: center; width:10%; background-color:#cc6666;'|Headmin
|-
|'''Do AIs need a definition of Syndicate agent?'''
|[https://tgstation13.org/phpBB/viewtopic.php?f=33&t=773#p15454 No, they know by default what a Syndicate agent is. This also applies to other antagonists.]
|Jun 23, 2014
|Hornygranny
|-
|'''AI's law zero'''
|[https://tgstation13.org/phpBB/viewtopic.php?f=33&t=5040#p130138 The law zero that a traitor AI gets means that it is an antagonist and it can ignore all other laws.]
|Oct 27, 2015
|KorPhaeron
|-
|'''Potential Law One Violations'''
|[https://tgstation13.org/phpBB/viewtopic.php?f=33&t=11563#p304371 "Prioritizing "potential future law violations" is a fucking terrible idea, since it makes silicons able to handwave basically any law two request with "yeah but if i let you in there you might potentially attack somebody inside, law 1 violation!!!""]
|Jun 06, 2017
|PKPenguin321
|-
|'''Define what classifies harm as willing, or change asimov++ law one'''
|[https://tgstation13.org/phpBB/viewtopic.php?p=655837#p655837 Acceptance of risk is not the same thing as acceptance of harm - Silicons should act to minimise harm not explicitly consented to as much as they are able - if in doubt, ask the human. For more specific examples, see the full response to the thread.]
|Nov 05, 2022
|Spookuni
|}